You people are so petty… and tiny.
(Source: crowned-stag)
Reason #781 I could never be the hero of a story: I’d have stabbed Morgana in the face about 3 episodes ago. (Watching episode 3.7)
Punk needs to invest in a stand of some sort for the WWE championship belt. I think he spent about 75% of his segment in the press conference fiddling with it.
I am disappointed that he didn’t take the girl up on her $100 for his shirt.
Foley posted a preview of his new children’s book he will be releasing soon through WWE. It looks like it will be a sequel to his previous Xmas book. The picture features WWE Superstars John Cena, The Miz, and CM Punk.
Cute!
His hair flip is so Pantene commercial in the first one. I do miss basketball shorts, blond Punk, tho.
(Source: heaterforyourthighs-deactivated1)
(Source: myreportfromundertheradar)
Raw's rating was a 3.5 combined
TV By the Numbers report 1.8 for the first hour and 1.7 for the second. Add it up, and you get 3.5. So why does Labar say it did 2.93 and 3.01, while Powell claims a 2.97 combined, and someone at the Torch say it’s “below 3.0”?
Is there a major credible ratings surveyor I don’t know about? Are the numbers argued by various committees? Or are these people just not checking their work? Note, not one of those reporters link to a source for this information.
TV by the numbers has those listed as the 18 - 49 rating, I think the others are going by total audience. So the total rating wouldn’t combine the two hours, it would be an average of the audience over those two hours. So 2.93 and 3.01 would be the total viewer numbers for 1st and 2nd hours respectively, and 2.97 would be the average of the two and technically that is below 3. Not saying ratings aren’t screwed up, but they are all correct in their own unique way.
I assume these are Nielsen ratings, btw, which you can get from their website (if you pay a ton of money, of course).
(Source: internationalobject)
Two steps forward…
I’m really just here to waste time.
